AI Papers Reader

Personalized digests of latest AI research

View on GitHub

EpiCoder: A New Framework for Diverse and Complex Code Generation

Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive potential in code generation, but existing methods often struggle to produce code that matches the complexity and diversity found in real-world software projects. A new paper introduces EpiCoder, a novel framework that addresses these limitations by synthesizing code data using a feature tree-based approach.

The core innovation of EpiCoder lies in its use of feature trees, which are hierarchical structures inspired by, but distinct from, Abstract Syntax Trees (ASTs). While ASTs focus on the syntactic structure of code, feature trees represent semantic relationships between code elements. For example, instead of just representing a function call, a feature tree would capture the function’s purpose (e.g., “data processing,” “network communication”), its input and output data types, and any libraries it uses.

The EpiCoder framework proceeds in three stages:

  1. Feature Tree Extraction: This stage starts with a seed dataset of code. The researchers use a powerful LLM (GPT-4) to extract features from the seed code and build an initial feature tree, representing semantic relationships. This is an iterative process, refining the tree structure to capture more features from the raw code.

  2. Feature Tree Evolution: To increase the diversity and complexity of the synthesized data, the feature tree is iteratively expanded. The LLM is used to add new features, increasing the tree’s depth and breadth. This controlled expansion allows for fine-grained control over the complexity of generated code, from simple function-level operations to intricate, multi-file programs.

  3. Feature Tree-Based Code Generation: Subtrees are sampled from the evolved feature tree, and the LLM generates code based on these features. This approach allows the generation of diverse code snippets that go beyond the limitations of simpler methods that only use code snippets as training data. The LLM generates not only the main code, but also test files to ensure correctness.

The paper evaluates EpiCoder’s performance against several well-established benchmarks for code generation, showing state-of-the-art results across various complexity levels. For example, on the HumanEval and MBPP benchmarks, EpiCoder-Qwen-7B achieves a significantly higher accuracy compared to other models of comparable size. Furthermore, on the file-level benchmark XFileDep, which tests the ability to generate multiple files with complex dependencies, EpiCoder also excels. The researchers also demonstrate the potential of their approach for generating complex repository-level code, suggesting significant applicability to real-world software development tasks.

Concrete examples from the paper illustrate the improvements: the authors show how EpiCoder can generate multi-file projects (Figure 3) with different modules interacting via dependencies. They also use metrics from software engineering (Halstead complexity, cyclomatic complexity, strictness) to quantitatively demonstrate the increased complexity and diversity of the data generated by their approach. This rigorously demonstrates the advantages of their method over existing approaches based solely on code snippets.

In summary, the EpiCoder framework offers a significant advancement in code generation. Its use of feature trees enables the synthesis of more diverse and complex code, providing a powerful tool for enhancing LLMs and addressing the challenges of real-world software development. The rigorous evaluation and analysis presented in the paper strongly support the claims made by the authors.