AI Papers Reader

Personalized digests of latest AI research

View on GitHub

A New Approach for Training Math-Solving AI

Large language models (LLMs) have made great strides in recent years, particularly in the field of natural language processing. However, they still struggle with tasks requiring complex reasoning and calculations. This paper presents a novel approach for enhancing the mathematical problem-solving capabilities of LLMs by integrating external tools and employing a direct preference learning technique.

Imagine asking an LLM to solve a complex mathematical problem, such as finding the sum of the first 100 prime numbers. Traditional LLMs might struggle with this, but a tool-integrated LLM could leverage a Python code interpreter to help with the calculations. The model could generate Python code, execute it, and then use the output to guide its reasoning process.

This paper introduces a new framework for training such tool-integrated LLMs, which focuses on the optimization of multi-turn reasoning and external tool integration. The key innovation lies in the use of direct preference learning, a technique that leverages human feedback to train the model without requiring a full reward model.

The framework builds upon the success of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), which has been widely adopted for aligning LLMs with human values. However, existing RLHF algorithms are typically designed for single-turn chat tasks, where the model only interacts with the user once. The authors address this limitation by developing multi-turn direct preference learning algorithms, which are specifically tailored for multi-turn reasoning tasks involving external tools.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach through experiments using various language models and datasets, including GSM8K and MATH. They show that their multi-turn direct preference learning framework significantly improves the performance of tool-integrated LLMs compared to standard supervised fine-tuning and other RLHF methods.

For example, they trained a supervised fine-tuned Gemma-1.1-it-7B model, which achieved an accuracy of 77.5% on GSM8K. By applying their multi-turn direct preference learning framework, they were able to improve the model’s accuracy to 83.9%. This represents a substantial improvement in the model’s ability to solve complex mathematical problems.

The paper also explores several important considerations for designing effective multi-turn direct preference learning algorithms, including:

The authors conclude that preference learning offers a promising alternative to supervised fine-tuning for training tool-integrated LLMs for mathematical reasoning. Their multi-turn direct preference learning framework provides a more effective and efficient way to leverage human feedback for training these complex models. They highlight potential future research directions, including the development of more sophisticated reward models, the exploration of alternative preference learning structures, and the extension of their framework to more general agent learning scenarios.

This paper represents a significant contribution to the field of LLM research, paving the way for the development of more capable and intelligent AI systems that can solve complex reasoning tasks and support human endeavors in a wide range of fields.